- Professional inkjet printer facilities a 10-color colouring ink complement for unusually clear images up to thirteen x nineteen inches
- FINE printhead record for limit 4800 x 2400 dpi resolution
- 2 apart paper paths await excellent art paper
- Includes matte black, print black, as well as gray inks for professional-quality black as well as white prints
- Dimensions: twenty-six x 7.5 x fourteen in. (WxHxD); weighs 30.8 pounds
Product Description
Canon PIXMA Pro9500 Photo Printer 13×19 (0373B001AA)Manufacturer Product Description
In a single hulk leap, a all-new PIXMA Pro9500 takes your work from merely “beautiful” to “extraordinary.” With 10 full-time tone colouring inks, modernized brand brand new software, camera-direct copy of hit sheets, as well as await for excellent art writings up to 13×19 inch, it’s a brand brand new customary for formulating your own veteran images. .caption { font-family: Verdana, Helvetica neue, Arial, serif; font-size: 10px; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; } ul.indent { list-style: inside disc; text-indent: 20px; } table.callout { font-family: Verdana, Helvetica, Arial, serif; margin: 10px; width: 250; } td.callout { hei… More >>
Canon Pixma Pro9500 Professional Large Format Inkjet Printer
Tags: Canon, Format, Inkjet, Large, PIXMA, Printer, Pro9500, Professional
I bought a Canon Pixma Pro9000 a couple years ago, and I didn’t use it very often. Now the printer is broken. I’ve had a Canon i860. It also only lasted a couple of years before one of the printer heads stopped printing. I owned both Epson and HP printers and they all lasted more than a couple years. My HP Photosmart 7350 is still working. The only complain I have about that printer is that the ink doesn’t last long. That’s the reason I switched to Canon. I think the image quality of the Canon printer is OK, but the hardware quality of their printers is worthless.
I have owned a Canon photo printer (i9100) It was great. This one is terrible. It is slow(very slow) and the prints are not really very good. With all the ink tanks ($) you would think that the photos would “radiate” color. They are dark. When you call the hot line they tell you that the printer only works well with semi gloss paper (and only Canon brand paper) I would return this printer if I could
This printer deserves a “big black hole” rating rather than any stars at all. All the prints that I do on matte photo paper come out dull. When I called the totally useless tech support they said that this machine only works well on Canon paper. They admit that it doesn’t do glossy prints well on any paper. Too bad about the reams of HP, Epson, and Staples paper that are on my shelf. I caved in a bought Canon matte paper and the prints are more dull than when I used the Staples matte paper. Worst yet it guzzles ink like a Hummer! I went through two $15 cartridges with about 20 dull prints.
I’ve never written a review on Amazon until tonight. I have a one word review of this printer: Stunning. Stunning, Stunning, Stunning. OK….four word review.
I was looking at the Canon Pixma Pro 9500 for around 4 months before I bought it.
I’m glad I didn’t go with any other brand.
After having printed many photos over the years I feel the canon line has the best of most worlds.
Quality of the prints I do is unbelievable when compared to printing to my other printer (HP).
The tones are closer to real life tones with the Canon and it is a fraction of the cost when compared to my other machine. I printed off pictures from my sisters wedding and had her compare them to the professionals work. She ended up buying me ink and paper to print her photos off instead of going to the professional.
As long as the quality of the machine matches its print quality, I can’t see myself buying any other brand of printer for a long time.